Sign in | Register now | Like us on FacebookLike Us | Follow us on TwitterFollow Us

Milwaukee's Daily Magazine for Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Wed
Hi: 74
Lo: 57
Thu
Hi: 84
Lo: 62
Fri
Hi: 77
Lo: 55
Advertise on OnMilwaukee.com
Board members and city aldermen meet with proponents of the merger proposal.
Board members and city aldermen meet with proponents of the merger proposal.

Merger proposal is a reminder that MPS must engage communities

The proposed merger of 68th Street School with nearby 81st Street School has been on our radar, as you've likely noticed if you follow what I write about Milwaukee schools. The issue is an important one.

For me, it's interesting, in part because the two schools are not far from where I live. But, of greater city-wide concern, there are similar discussions popping up in other neighborhoods, too – most notably Bay View – where residents are eager to return to the idea of the local school as a neighborhood anchor.

Folks across the city are watching to see how this plays out. Future enrollment in the district may be affected not simply by how it ends, but also by how it is handled by MPS.

As a bit of background, 68th Street School's building is a small one and its program – which includes a number of K3 students (unfunded by the state) – has had a difficult time keeping up with the budget realities. Threats of closure have been playing like a broken record for many, many years. In the past couple years, that talk has heated up and although the school avoided shutting down last year, it couldn't escape that reality this year.

It was encouraging at the end of 2011 when MPS Superintendent Gregory Thornton asked the board for more time to try and find a way to keep the school's successful early childhood program alive in a different location.

Almost immediately, a group of parents and staffers from the school joined forces with neighborhood associations from Lenox Heights (68th Street's home), Cooper Park (81st Street's), Enderis Park and Enderis East, to craft a proposal that would merge 68th Street's program with 81st Street's K-8 program. Later, Kops Park neighborhood became part of the discussion, too.

For the next few weeks, these folks worked hard to craft a detailed 50-page plan, bringing in the two aldermen who represent the areas and talking to a number of school board directors, too. They sought advice and they tried to build a workable plan. They also attempted to approach 81st Street School and after an initial welcome, they say they were rebuffed by the school's principal after she'd been told by MPS administration not to speak to them.

Could they have made some missteps? Maybe, but who wouldn't? They're not professional politicians or community organizers. They're residents concerned about their neighborhoods and schools.

Though it's hard to imagine no one on Vliet Street had heard of this plan, that seemed to be the position the week of the January board meeting at which it was discussed. Folks were saying the district, "just got the plan this morning," the day before the meeting.

While the proposal was submitted that day, the meat of it ought to have been very well known by then. We wrote numerous articles, Office of Board Governance knew – it had been informed of meetings with school board members – board members knew, the 81st Street School principal knew, two aldermen and their staffs knew, members of four neighborhood associations surrounding the schools had been informed, the area's regional executive specialist, who reports to the superintendent, certainly knew and was in frequent contact with those putting forth the idea.

The administration has its own proposal and that is to move 68th Street's program to Kluge, four miles directly north. Kluge likes the idea. Ninety-seven percent of 68th Street families responding to a survey said they would not attend Kluge.

Certainly the district doesn't have to do exactly what a community group suggests. It can't be expected to run a roughly 170-school district by consensus. But it does have a duty to work in a respectful, open way with those groups who are seeking to bolster schools and communities. Whether or not that has happened here depends who you ask, of course.

The neighborhood plan is an attempt to preserve a program but also to bring students back into a district that suffers near-constant sagging enrollment; to lure some of the many neighborhood families back to MPS via a great neighborhood school.

The staff at 81st Street School doesn't want to alter its program to K3-5, which it might have to do in order to accommodate the 68th Street program. It doesn't want its sixth-eighth graders to have to leave to attend other schools. And they fear that if the plan fails, it could bring down their school. Who can blame them for any of these concerns?

The solution, however, should not be to kill a plan because everyone does not immediately agree. These two schools must get together and have a serious talk about what the future looks like in terms of budgets, in terms of enrollments, in terms of community support and see if they can agree to a workable plan that suits everyone.

MPS should be in the business of facilitating these discussions. To ignore their potential is a lost opportunity. Overall, MPS must sit down and talk with communities across the city. If it wants to know why families left and how to get them back, ask them.

And when four neighborhoods come knocking on your door with an idea that maybe isn't perfect, saying they want to not only keep families from leaving the district, but to help bring families back? Open the door, pour them a cup of coffee, roll up your sleeves and get down to business.

These are not your enemies. These are not the people to out-maneuver. These are your allies ... for now. Hold them tight.

Talkbacks

wauwatosa | Feb. 18, 2012 at 8:42 a.m. (report)

For 5 years my family lived in the Cooper Park neighborhood and loved every minute of it. A great park, friendly neighbors and relative safety added up to one good place to live. By 2005 with 2 near school age children the age old question of where we would send our kids to school arose. What were our options? We're not religious so that took any private school such as Christ King on 92nd and Center off the table. Our eyes turned to the local public schools. Our options were the German Immersion school and 81st St. school. German Immersion has a great reputation but we wernt interested in our kids learning german. 81st had a well deserved terrible reputation with some of the worst test scores in the city filled with kids from other neighborhoods bused to school each day. In other words, a failing school that none of our neighborhood kids actually attended. The antithesis of a supportive school. So what did we do faced with these choices? You got it, moved to Tosa where we could be part of a neighborhood school with people who had a vested interest in our school and kids. What did Milwaukee lose? Another solid middle class family, $4000 in property taxes and social cohesion. Would we have stayed if MPS could of offered a quality school with great neighborhood support? Hindsight is 20/20 but there's a good chance we'd still be there. When i read about things such as this topic i get frustrated beyond belief. It' s a sad fact but Milwaukee will remain mired in it's problems until MPS is fixed. Budget cuts certainly dont help the situation. I wish you and your family luck Bobby but i cant help but see a future for you in which you and your friends join the well beaten path out of MPS and most likely the city as well. It doesn't have to be this way, thats the saddest part of all.

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 0.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Mkemom | Feb. 16, 2012 at 1:19 p.m. (report)

Right on, Bobby. As a former MPS parent whose kids are now in a suburban school, my greatest frustration was the district's lack of respect for the investments that parents wanted to make in their schools. When you have a group of parents who are committed and engaged, it seems like the district should be bending over backwards to make possibilities for those parents to improve their school. Instead, I had the experience of endless bureaucratic road blocks from staff who were disrespectful of my time, effort, and commitment, who misled me, and who generally made it impossible for me to have a real stake in my children's education.

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 5.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

MPSparent | Feb. 15, 2012 at 4:26 p.m. (report)

Mr. Tanzilo, thank you for writing this. As a member of the committee drafting the proposals for a merger, I've been consistently disturbed by MPS Administration's inability to work effectively with an community eager to help MPS schools and MPS enrollment. You would think well-intentioned, organized efforts on the part of parents and neighborhoods would be seen as a golden opportunity for MPS, but instead Administration has more often reacted in a hostile, belittling way. Disrupting and controlling communication between the neighborhoods and 81st Street School, whether through pressure on the principals or through spreading misinformation (1.2 million to run one K3 classroom?!) has been typical of MPS Administration's "divide and conquer" techniques. Thankfully we've not received that same reaction from the MPS School Board.

MPS is hurting for funding and enrollment. In a year or two, when busing is cut back in order to keep class size in check, schools without close connections to their neighborhood will be scrambling to keep their enrollment numbers. This is a unique opportunity for 81st Street and MPS to reconnect to its neighborhoods and to communities eager to have, as you said, a "neighborhood anchor." This is good for kids, good for schools, and good for Milwaukee. MPS will not survive without it.

I agree that the most important step right now is to sit down and talk about the proposal. Put everything up for discussion, get neighbors and teacher and families together, and see what we can do to make this work. Compromise, work together, and build community. And if MPS Administration won't provide the cups of coffee--I will. Let's talk.

Rate this:
  • Average rating: 5.0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Post your comment/review now 3 comments about this article.
Post your comment/review now

Facebook comments

Disclaimer: Please note that Facebook comments are posted through Facebook and cannot be approved, edited or declined by OnMilwaukee.com. The opinions expressed in Facebook comments do not necessarily reflect those of OnMilwaukee.com or its staff.